X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID:	<50A9BFC9.8010100@neurotica.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:12:41 -0500
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Thoughts on gschem UI
References:	<50A688B8 DOT 4090809 AT neurotica DOT com> <CC923058-B962-45B5-973D-EA03906430B9 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A6A265 DOT 6050300 AT neurotica DOT com> <4E8E6F31-EF8D-4540-BA86-7935C1C3E6D8 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A6A95C DOT 5030903 AT neurotica DOT com> <355DEF4F-51BB-44A8-A5F4-D8564E7E7885 AT noqsi DOT com> <20121116213601 DOT 13718 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <66889AAB-3A82-4861-ACB0-B35A876EF6F4 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8s3837dD5so1hu-QOm8PW69sehVNNX7njQvnRGzXODGw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <B63F900B-2C12-48A4-AD4B-5A616078030B AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c9BAJe8_7KLL8aaGq30HCkj+q74DB9jywXRXogJzdqNzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50A83AAA DOT 6060500 AT jump-ing DOT de> <B1A7C9C1-5EAE-49AB-A03A-D5D4AFD3B0C0 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A8615E DOT 2080800 AT neurotica DOT com> <05730E0F-4DA1-47C8-80BB-5D4F37EFD94E AT noqsi DOT com> <50A8675D DOT 30509 AT neurotica DOT com> <565D7E6F-DC3C-42E8-A069-519129E281BF AT noqsi DOT com> <50A90BC7 DOT 8080901 AT neurotica DOT com> <CCE840E8-FADA-49F8-8075-FBB8B2C33510 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A92363 DOT 8060607 AT neurotica DOT com> <B313AD5C-7A14-4B58-B767-3D453EFDC380 AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<B313AD5C-7A14-4B58-B767-3D453EFDC380@noqsi.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.4.5
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 11/18/2012 10:32 PM, John Doty wrote:
>> The internals of gschem haven't been completely rewritten in a long
>> time, if at all, yet from about 2004-2007 it morphed from a program
>> which I found very difficult to use to a program which I find very
>> EASY to use.
> 
> Interesting. I started using it in 2002, and haven't really seen any
> great improvement in usability.

  I started with it right around that time, perhaps late 2001.  I
noticed *tremendous* improvements in usability over those years.

> It was good then, and is good now.
> Mostly, I've been hurt by unanticipated consequences of
> "improvements". At least some of the worst ideas (e.g. magnetic net
> mode) can be turned off by the rc files.

  Well yeah, I turn off magnetic net mode too.  But seriously, you've
seen no usability improvements?

  I dunno about you, man...but when I dislike something this much, I
dump it.

               -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -