X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:20:36 +0100
From:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Cc:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Fw: [geda-help] How to get element outline off-board
In-Reply-To:	<20210308030229.4936b11f@swips.iqo.uni-hannover.de>
References:	<20210308030229 DOT 4936b11f AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
Message-ID:	<24f5ba4f1cd5305994d137c9275705d8@iae.nl>
X-Sender:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
User-Agent:	Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4
ClaraMail2-Webmail-AuthUser:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2021-03-08 03:02, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> schrieb am 25. February 2021:
> 
>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, Torben Friis (friistf AT gmail DOT com) [via
>> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> > I have not been using the design software for some time. I have used
>> > gEDA and lately Lepton/Lepton-cli(?). Now I am confused - should I
>> > use gEDA or Lepton/Lepton-cli?
>> 
>> [ gEDA/gaf 1.10 changelog ]

As Guile and Python both are interpreters, I assumed gEDA would
still be completely configurable by the user.

> TL;DR:
> Use lepton-eda if you like scheme and enjoy hacking guile scripts to
> adopt the suite to your special needs.
> Stay with geda if you are more into python and would like to benefit
> from the recent improvements of the gschem GUI.

Here you seem to be saying that hacking Python scripts is impossible.
That is a fundamental change.

-marcel

- Raw text -