X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:20:36 +0100
From: mhx AT iae DOT nl
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Cc: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Fw: [geda-help] How to get element outline off-board
In-Reply-To: <20210308030229.4936b11f@swips.iqo.uni-hannover.de>
References: <20210308030229 DOT 4936b11f AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
Message-ID: <24f5ba4f1cd5305994d137c9275705d8@iae.nl>
X-Sender: mhx AT iae DOT nl
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4
ClaraMail2-Webmail-AuthUser: mhx AT iae DOT nl
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-03-08 03:02, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> schrieb am 25. February 2021:
> 
>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, Torben Friis (friistf AT gmail DOT com) [via
>> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> > I have not been using the design software for some time. I have used
>> > gEDA and lately Lepton/Lepton-cli(?). Now I am confused - should I
>> > use gEDA or Lepton/Lepton-cli?
>> 
>> [ gEDA/gaf 1.10 changelog ]

As Guile and Python both are interpreters, I assumed gEDA would
still be completely configurable by the user.

> TL;DR:
> Use lepton-eda if you like scheme and enjoy hacking guile scripts to
> adopt the suite to your special needs.
> Stay with geda if you are more into python and would like to benefit
> from the recent improvements of the gschem GUI.

Here you seem to be saying that hacking Python scripts is impossible.
That is a fundamental change.

-marcel