X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: new C11 ISO C standard will have threads
Date:	Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<f0b2f756-7e32-4e1d-b17d-319906edfbb7@u20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References:	<175ee7e3-6178-4d22-8be0-0f22d13d305b AT m4g2000pbc DOT googlegroups DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	65.13.115.246
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1326694001 9776 127.0.0.1 (16 Jan 2012 06:06:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:06:41 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	u20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client:	true
X-Google-Header-Order:	HNKUARELSC
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.7
	(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.75 Safari/535.7,gzip(gfe)
Bytes:	2368
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q0G6F2l1017684
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Jan 15, 7:12 pm, jimm <jmich DOT  DOT  DOT  AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
>
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ISO-updates-C-standard-1400814...
> new C11 ISO C standard will have threads

Don't mean to burst your bubble, but Wikipedia says this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C11_(C_standard_revision)

"
Optional features

The new revision allows implementations not to support certain parts
of the standard — including some that had been mandatory to support in
the 1999 revision. Programs can use predefined macros to determine
whether an implementation supports a certain feature or not.
"

Feature	                        Feature test macro      Availability
in C99
===========================================================================
Multithreading (<threads.h>)	__STDC_NO_THREADS__	Not available


P.S. Don't worry, I'm sure it won't be any less supported than the
already non-existent DOS threading support.    ;-)

- Raw text -