X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: new C11 ISO C standard will have threads Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:06:40 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <175ee7e3-6178-4d22-8be0-0f22d13d305b AT m4g2000pbc DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1326694001 9776 127.0.0.1 (16 Jan 2012 06:06:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: u20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HNKUARELSC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.75 Safari/535.7,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2368 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q0G6F2l1017684 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Jan 15, 7:12 pm, jimm wrote: > > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ISO-updates-C-standard-1400814... > new C11 ISO C standard will have threads Don't mean to burst your bubble, but Wikipedia says this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C11_(C_standard_revision) " Optional features The new revision allows implementations not to support certain parts of the standard — including some that had been mandatory to support in the 1999 revision. Programs can use predefined macros to determine whether an implementation supports a certain feature or not. " Feature Feature test macro Availability in C99 =========================================================================== Multithreading () __STDC_NO_THREADS__ Not available P.S. Don't worry, I'm sure it won't be any less supported than the already non-existent DOS threading support. ;-)