Mail Archives: djgpp/2005/11/21/13:31:05
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
|
| From: | "News Reader" <nospam AT aol DOT com>
|
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
| References: | <4381ac27$0$6865$91cee783 AT newsreader01 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at> <4381F68D DOT 7020804 AT latnet DOT lv>
|
| Subject: | Re: gcc4.02 or gcc4.10
|
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:17:08 +0100
|
| X-Priority: | 3
|
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal
|
| X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
|
| X-RFC2646: | Format=Flowed; Response
|
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
|
| Lines: | 43
|
| Message-ID: | <43820f72$0$6859$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at>
|
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 212.183.33.100
|
| X-Trace: | 1132597106 newsreader01.highway.telekom.at 6859 212.183.33.100:9872
|
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
"Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> wrote in message
news:4381F68D DOT 7020804 AT latnet DOT lv...
> News Reader wrote:
>> Not that I need it, not that I'm impatient, but
>> is there a gcc4.02 around the corner or does
>> the famous djgpp team alrady fully concentrate
>> on the upcoming 4.10 version?
>>
> The question is that we all don't have infinite amount of time. I have
> built
> DJGPP archives of GCC for several years, but at this time I'm much less
> interested
> in DJGPP rather than earlier. I have other things to carry about and DJGPP
> currently is
> very low in my priority list.
>
> gcc-4.0.2: it is question of building the "official" archives for DJGPP
> distribution.
> I can make available SRPMS for Fedora Core 4 for building Linux to DJGPP
> cross-compiler,
> (maybe after a small updating). A side effect of building it is also DJGPP
> source archive, that
> one can use to build gcc-4.0.2 as native compiler for DJGPP.
>
> gcc-4.1.0: I did earlier some work with it, but I have not touched it any
> more for about half a year and also then I had serious problems with
> building it. This situation is rather likely to stay so.
>
> Andris
>
Thank you for all that info.
It is quite understandable that djgpp is ranked
low on your priority list.
Nevertheless, on behalf of all happy djgpp users,
thanks a lot for your efforts regarding previous
releases!
- Raw text -