X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: "News Reader" <nospam AT aol DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <4381ac27$0$6865$91cee783 AT newsreader01 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at> <4381F68D DOT 7020804 AT latnet DOT lv>
Subject: Re: gcc4.02 or gcc4.10
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:17:08 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <43820f72$0$6859$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.183.33.100
X-Trace: 1132597106 newsreader01.highway.telekom.at 6859 212.183.33.100:9872
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


"Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> wrote in message 
news:4381F68D DOT 7020804 AT latnet DOT lv...
> News Reader wrote:
>> Not that I need it, not that I'm impatient, but
>> is there a gcc4.02 around the corner or does
>> the famous djgpp team alrady fully concentrate
>> on the upcoming 4.10 version?
>>
> The question is that we all don't have infinite amount of time. I have 
> built
> DJGPP archives of GCC for several years, but at this time I'm much less 
> interested
> in DJGPP rather than earlier. I have other things to carry about and DJGPP 
> currently is
> very low in my priority list.
>
> gcc-4.0.2:  it is question  of building the "official" archives for DJGPP 
> distribution.
> I can make available SRPMS for Fedora Core 4 for building Linux to DJGPP 
> cross-compiler,
> (maybe after a small updating). A side effect of building it is also DJGPP 
> source archive, that
> one can use to build gcc-4.0.2 as native compiler for DJGPP.
>
> gcc-4.1.0: I did earlier some work with it, but I have not touched it any 
> more for about half a year and also then I had serious problems with 
> building it. This situation is rather likely to stay so.
>
> Andris
>

Thank you for all that info.

It is quite understandable that djgpp is ranked
low on your priority list.

Nevertheless, on behalf of all happy djgpp users,
thanks a lot for your efforts regarding previous
releases!