From:	Andrew Cottrell <andnews AT ihug DOT com DOT oz DOT au>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: SVGALIB packed lamely
Date:	Mon, 07 Apr 2003 20:18:04 +1000
Organization:	ECLiPSE
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<7uj29vosh80d0ge10rc9apbs09lqdb2qos@4ax.com>
References:	<200304070424 DOT h374Oo626004 AT pavo DOT ncbi DOT nlm DOT nih DOT gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	p228-tnt8.syd.ihug.com.au
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	lust.ihug.co.nz 1049710691 28143 203.173.147.228 (7 Apr 2003 10:18:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT ihug DOT co DOT nz
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:18:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>Just a note to the maintainer of packages svgalib{b,s}.zip
>that these archives do not follow directory layout
>of the other packages that normally deploy libraries
>in lib/, sources in [this case I'd think] contrib/package/src, etc.
>Instead, these two files expand right into the current directory,
>and then have to be manually moved where appropriate.
>It'd be great to have that fixed.

The files in the V2TK directory in 99% of cases do NOT follow any
standard, apart from that they have been contributed from end users
and have worked with at least one version of DJGPP released.

I would suggest that you try to deal directly with the svgalib
maintainer with this or read the FAQ about submitting programs and
update it yourself if you feel so strong about it.

Andrew

- Raw text -