From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Compiling GRX 245
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:12:42 +0000
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<3E6D0DDA.87CDD261@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References:	<200303101412 DOT 54939 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <3e6ce5f6 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <b4ir80$40v$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	62.136.8.167
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 1047336947 18110 62.136.8.167 (10 Mar 2003 22:55:47 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	10 Mar 2003 22:55:47 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
[snip]
> .. or whatever else is needed to make sure the user, reading that
> note, can go and check whether they have to get a fresh djdev203.zip,
> and how to make sure the one they get is the one they need.  A
> "patchlevel" or similar would do --- to be displayed in the
> manifest/djdev203.ver or the DSM file, maybe.  And/or by go32-v2.exe
> as part of its output.

That's already the case:

bash-2.04$ pakke -q djdev
Warning: Unable to check that 'z:/mirror' is a directory (errno = 22): No such
file or directory (ENOENT)
djdev 2.03 patchlevel 2 (binaries)
1 package(s) matched

bash-2.04$ cat /djgpp/manifest/djdev203.ver
djdev203 Development Kit and Runtime (6/2002 Refresh)

[snip]
> There is this 'pakke' thing... not bad at all from my limited
> experience with it, but currently not an official requirement.
[snip]

That almost sounds like a nearly-satisfied user. ;)

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -