From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Compiling GRX 245 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:12:42 +0000 Lines: 33 Message-ID: <3E6D0DDA.87CDD261@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> References: <200303101412 DOT 54939 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <3e6ce5f6 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.136.8.167 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 1047336947 18110 62.136.8.167 (10 Mar 2003 22:55:47 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Mar 2003 22:55:47 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote: [snip] > .. or whatever else is needed to make sure the user, reading that > note, can go and check whether they have to get a fresh djdev203.zip, > and how to make sure the one they get is the one they need. A > "patchlevel" or similar would do --- to be displayed in the > manifest/djdev203.ver or the DSM file, maybe. And/or by go32-v2.exe > as part of its output. That's already the case: bash-2.04$ pakke -q djdev Warning: Unable to check that 'z:/mirror' is a directory (errno = 22): No such file or directory (ENOENT) djdev 2.03 patchlevel 2 (binaries) 1 package(s) matched bash-2.04$ cat /djgpp/manifest/djdev203.ver djdev203 Development Kit and Runtime (6/2002 Refresh) [snip] > There is this 'pakke' thing... not bad at all from my limited > experience with it, but currently not an official requirement. [snip] That almost sounds like a nearly-satisfied user. ;) Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]