Message-ID:	<3DCAA829.FB98B5DB@lml.ls.fi.upm.es>
Date:	Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:51:37 +0100
From:	Manuel Collado <m DOT collado AT aaron DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Is gcc-3.2 an official versions
References:	<CAC03AD3B71FD41195CC00508B6A7EAB02ACAAE5 AT TOR8> <200211051346 DOT gA5Dkx817350 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	138.100.10.20
X-Trace:	7 Nov 2002 18:51:47 +0100, 138.100.10.20
Lines:	20
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

[reposting, perhaps the previous post got lost]

DJ Delorie wrote:
> [snip]
> If the mini-faq differs from the ftp sites, the mini-faq is wrong.
> It's a manually maintained file, so if you spot any other
> discrepancies, let us know.

Mini-faq            Ftp sites

gcc-3.1             3.2
gzip-1.2.4a         1.3
perl-5.6.1          5.6.1b
sh-utils-2.01       2.0.11
pakke-0.2.1         0.2.2

Hope it helps.
-- 
To reply by e-mail, please remove the extra dot
in the given address:  m.collado -> mcollado

- Raw text -