Message-ID: <3DCAA829.FB98B5DB@lml.ls.fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:51:37 +0100
From: Manuel Collado <m DOT collado AT aaron DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is gcc-3.2 an official versions
References: <CAC03AD3B71FD41195CC00508B6A7EAB02ACAAE5 AT TOR8> <200211051346 DOT gA5Dkx817350 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.100.10.20
X-Trace: 7 Nov 2002 18:51:47 +0100, 138.100.10.20
Lines: 20
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

[reposting, perhaps the previous post got lost]

DJ Delorie wrote:
> [snip]
> If the mini-faq differs from the ftp sites, the mini-faq is wrong.
> It's a manually maintained file, so if you spot any other
> discrepancies, let us know.

Mini-faq            Ftp sites

gcc-3.1             3.2
gzip-1.2.4a         1.3
perl-5.6.1          5.6.1b
sh-utils-2.01       2.0.11
pakke-0.2.1         0.2.2

Hope it helps.
-- 
To reply by e-mail, please remove the extra dot
in the given address:  m.collado -> mcollado