Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2001 17:43:12 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	ahelm AT gmx DOT net
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GCC 2.95.3 and C standard(s) + commandline switch problems
In-Reply-To:	<26009.986819129@www12.gmx.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010409174150.5401C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 ahelm AT gmx DOT net wrote:

> > Does the GCC docs says anywhere that version 2.95.3 supports C9x?  AFAIK, 
> > it doesn't.  If I'm right, you will have to wait until GCC v3.0 is 
> > released (or some later version, if 3.0 won't support C9x).
> 
> "info gcc" says so. (It didn't for 2.95.2)

Then it sounds like a bug that should be reported to the GCC maintainers.

> > As for the documented options, I suggest to post your report to the GCC 
> > bug-reporting address ("gcc --help" should print that address).  Perhaps 
> > the whole issue should have been reported there as well.
> 
> Hmmm. I'm not so sure that this is actually a GCC problem and
> not a DJGPP port problem. AFAIK the method of passing switches
> from gcc to cc1 et. al. is different in DJGPP than UNIX?

No, AFAIK there's nothing DJGPP-specific in how arguments are passed to 
cc1.

- Raw text -