Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 17:43:12 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz AT is To: ahelm AT gmx DOT net cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.3 and C standard(s) + commandline switch problems In-Reply-To: <26009.986819129@www12.gmx.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 ahelm AT gmx DOT net wrote: > > Does the GCC docs says anywhere that version 2.95.3 supports C9x? AFAIK, > > it doesn't. If I'm right, you will have to wait until GCC v3.0 is > > released (or some later version, if 3.0 won't support C9x). > > "info gcc" says so. (It didn't for 2.95.2) Then it sounds like a bug that should be reported to the GCC maintainers. > > As for the documented options, I suggest to post your report to the GCC > > bug-reporting address ("gcc --help" should print that address). Perhaps > > the whole issue should have been reported there as well. > > Hmmm. I'm not so sure that this is actually a GCC problem and > not a DJGPP port problem. AFAIK the method of passing switches > from gcc to cc1 et. al. is different in DJGPP than UNIX? No, AFAIK there's nothing DJGPP-specific in how arguments are passed to cc1.