From:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: How does OR Will gcc produce assembler output in intel syntax with the new GAS ".intel_syntax" directive
Date:	Wed, 03 Jan 2001 13:25:16 -0500
Organization:	Snowball's Web
Message-ID:	<4ir65tcgk1jchh5saftrle25jotolt3dv1@4ax.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010103183144 DOT 4647B-100000 AT is> <t56qn5jpedj77d AT corp DOT supernews DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version:	1.0
NNTP-Posting-Host:	166.72.160.138
X-Trace:	3 Jan 2001 18:23:03 GMT, 166.72.160.138
Lines:	14
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT prserv DOT net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Shawn Harrison"
<zils AT fuse DOT net,crazyfingers AT fuse DOT net,harrisso AT email DOT uc DOT edu,shou2 AT juno DOT com> wrote:
>what it boils down to is: GAS 2.10 supports intel syntax, will gcc produce
>(intel syntax) assembler output too
>GAS has it, so why wouldn't gcc support producing it.
>

-mintel-syntax will do the trick in gcc 3.0 (when released).

Mark

-- 
Mark E.: snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com
http://snowball.frogspace.net/

- Raw text -