From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: How does OR Will gcc produce assembler output in intel syntax with the new GAS ".intel_syntax" directive
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 13:25:16 -0500
Organization: Snowball's Web
Message-ID: <4ir65tcgk1jchh5saftrle25jotolt3dv1@4ax.com>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010103183144 DOT 4647B-100000 AT is> <t56qn5jpedj77d AT corp DOT supernews DOT com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.72.160.138
X-Trace: 3 Jan 2001 18:23:03 GMT, 166.72.160.138
Lines: 14
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT prserv DOT net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Shawn Harrison"
<zils AT fuse DOT net,crazyfingers AT fuse DOT net,harrisso AT email DOT uc DOT edu,shou2 AT juno DOT com> wrote:
>what it boils down to is: GAS 2.10 supports intel syntax, will gcc produce
>(intel syntax) assembler output too
>GAS has it, so why wouldn't gcc support producing it.
>

-mintel-syntax will do the trick in gcc 3.0 (when released).

Mark

-- 
Mark E.: snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com
http://snowball.frogspace.net/