Date:	Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:35:47 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Message-Id:	<1438-Fri17Nov2000173546+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<8v37h5$bmn$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> (message from
	Hans-Bernhard Broeker on 17 Nov 2000 12:15:33 GMT)
Subject:	Re: GNU Software for MS-Windows and MS-DOS
References:	<8v1ivd$20a$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001116120032 DOT 5962H-100000 AT is> <8v1ivd$20a$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001117010548 DOT 02ea1de0 AT myrealbox DOT com> <8v37h5$bmn$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 17 Nov 2000 12:15:33 GMT
> 
> MinGW just doesn't provide enough of POSIX compatibility to be able
> to support any of the more advanced GNU programs.

Someone posted here several months ago an announcement about a Windows
library based on DJGPP's libc (search for PW32 in the DJGPP
mail-archives page).  Using that library, it should be easy to port
many GNU tools by simply using the DJGPP ported sources.

> Gcc works, since it's essentially limited to bare C features, but I've
> yet to see a 'make' or 'gdb' compiled with MinGW that really
> works. Let alone an Emacs.

There's a working MinGW port of Make (the patches almost got submitted
to the Make maintainer), and the next version of Emacs will compile
with MinGW.  But it is true, in general, that the number of ports is
not large, and they do not present a coherent toolchain like DJGPP and
Cygwin do.

> [ObDJGPP: Last I looked, Cygwin was still a long shot behind DJGPP in
> terms of daily usability. Their bash port is just about useless for
> interactive work, IMHO.]

You may wish to look again.  AFAIK, Cygwin is much better lately,
since DJ started to work on it ;-)

- Raw text -