From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject:	Re: c|net: Microsoft has officially killed MS-DOS.
Date:	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 22:35:41 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<38FB597D.5D81BF0B@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<0vlffsc21hthnqfaramn08d9gb9jfk5v74 AT 4ax DOT com> <0671ec78 DOT 58ba4650 AT usw-ex0110-075 DOT remarq DOT com> <MPG DOT 13644ba7a7f07b998ba6f AT news DOT freeserve DOT net> <u65lfsstl12hru0iltavj9hp7jcjpe7g4e AT 4ax DOT com> <MPG DOT 13655d355e21bbae98ba70 AT news DOT freeserve DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp107-8.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 955996691 48036 212.188.107.8 (17 Apr 2000 18:38:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	17 Apr 2000 18:38:11 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

There should not be any noticable difference, though. Both seem to have the same
gfx pipeline.

-- 
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

"Andrew R. Gillett" wrote:
> 
> In comp.os.msdos.djgpp, Damian Yerrick wrote:
> > >That's a bit daft - you can't directly compare, say, Quake 3 to Quake 1.
> >
> > Quake 1 was ported.  Even Doom was ported several times.
> > Try Quake95 frame rate vs. DOS Quake frame rate.
> 
> I did at the time. Difference between WinQuake and Quake was about
> 0.02fps.

- Raw text -