Date:	Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:58:32 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Sanda AT 97 DOT gyarab DOT cz
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: dxe loading
In-Reply-To:	<85D1BFF34FC@gyarab.cz>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991108185625.21718b@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 8 Nov 1999 Sanda AT 97 DOT gyarab DOT cz wrote:

> I would like to ask if it's possible to somehow overcome limitations
> of dxe (i mean output). I've found out that it's impossible to call 
> almost anything from the function.

Did you read section 22.14 of the FAQ?  It explains the limitations of 
DXE, and gives some advice how to work around them.

> But with it's linking limitations it's probably impossible to change 
> gcc to interpreted language such as perl or lpc.

If you want dynamic-loaded code that is free from most of DXE's 
limitations, consider using DLX or DLM, both are mentioned in section 
22.3 of the FAQ.

- Raw text -