Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:58:32 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Sanda AT 97 DOT gyarab DOT cz
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: dxe loading
In-Reply-To: <85D1BFF34FC@gyarab.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991108185625.21718b@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 8 Nov 1999 Sanda AT 97 DOT gyarab DOT cz wrote:

> I would like to ask if it's possible to somehow overcome limitations
> of dxe (i mean output). I've found out that it's impossible to call 
> almost anything from the function.

Did you read section 22.14 of the FAQ?  It explains the limitations of 
DXE, and gives some advice how to work around them.

> But with it's linking limitations it's probably impossible to change 
> gcc to interpreted language such as perl or lpc.

If you want dynamic-loaded code that is free from most of DXE's 
limitations, consider using DLX or DLM, both are mentioned in section 
22.3 of the FAQ.