From:	michael AT toobie DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (Michael Kearns)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject:	Re: An updated DOS - Please discuss
Organization:	none
Message-ID:	<37ddafe0.858354@news-reader.bt.net>
References:	<37d7913a DOT 10901976 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <37d8570d$0$14670 AT mojo DOT crosslink DOT net> <37d9bd34 DOT 955844 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <7rfieg$70a$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	27
Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 1999 08:07:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	194.75.234.2
X-Trace:	newreader.ukcore.bt.net 937210127 194.75.234.2 (Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:08:47 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:08:47 BST
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 12 Sep 1999 01:49:52 -0500, les AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net (Leslie Mikesell) wrote:


>What improvements would you want that haven't already been done
>years ago in other operating systems?

It's not just a case of having 'new' features. It's incorporating existing
enhancements into an OS which I happen to like and think is well suited to
the x86 platform.

>The only thing DOS does is load a program and then let it take
>complete control of the machine.  That turns out not to be a very
>good model if you ever want to run two programs at once.  Why not
>run DOSEMU under Linux, either on the console or in an Xwindow?

Hence the proposal for multi-tasking within the DOS kernel. A lot of people
suggest running DOSEmu under Linux, or using an NT DOS box, or something
similar, but all of those solutions entail having a lot of additional
'baggage' (the other OS) installed and taking up resources.

I could quite happily run a DOS emulation under Windows (any variety),
Linux, FreeBSD, BeOS and probably quite a few other OSs. I don't want that.
I want DOS, by itself, with enhanced functionality. Simple.

Regards,

Michael.

- Raw text -