From: michael AT toobie DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (Michael Kearns) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc Subject: Re: An updated DOS - Please discuss Organization: none Message-ID: <37ddafe0.858354@news-reader.bt.net> References: <37d7913a DOT 10901976 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <37d8570d$0$14670 AT mojo DOT crosslink DOT net> <37d9bd34 DOT 955844 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <7rfieg$70a$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 08:07:28 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.75.234.2 X-Trace: newreader.ukcore.bt.net 937210127 194.75.234.2 (Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:08:47 BST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:08:47 BST To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On 12 Sep 1999 01:49:52 -0500, les AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net (Leslie Mikesell) wrote: >What improvements would you want that haven't already been done >years ago in other operating systems? It's not just a case of having 'new' features. It's incorporating existing enhancements into an OS which I happen to like and think is well suited to the x86 platform. >The only thing DOS does is load a program and then let it take >complete control of the machine. That turns out not to be a very >good model if you ever want to run two programs at once. Why not >run DOSEMU under Linux, either on the console or in an Xwindow? Hence the proposal for multi-tasking within the DOS kernel. A lot of people suggest running DOSEmu under Linux, or using an NT DOS box, or something similar, but all of those solutions entail having a lot of additional 'baggage' (the other OS) installed and taking up resources. I could quite happily run a DOS emulation under Windows (any variety), Linux, FreeBSD, BeOS and probably quite a few other OSs. I don't want that. I want DOS, by itself, with enhanced functionality. Simple. Regards, Michael.