From:	"David Mitchell" <dmitchell AT inet DOT net DOT nz>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: RHIDE AND EMACS...Which one is better?
Date:	Mon, 9 Aug 1999 16:34:39 +1200
Organization:	Inet Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<934174532.375811@kyle.inet.net.nz>
References:	<19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	kyle.inet.net.nz
X-Trace:	titan.xtra.co.nz 934173500 6441958 202.50.171.4 (9 Aug 1999 04:38:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT xtra DOT co DOT nz
NNTP-Posting-Date:	9 Aug 1999 04:38:20 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Cache-Post-Path:	kyle.inet.net.nz!unknown AT p169-tnt1 DOT inet DOT net DOT nz
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Orvbongat wrote in message <19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com>...
>Which is one is a better IDE...Rhide or EMACS?
>

A matter of opinion really.  I prefer RHIDE, because it has that familiar
DOS feel, but I'm sure a UNIX boffin would be scoffing at this and would be
able to name a thousand reasons which make emacs better.

David

PS I also prefer RHIDE because emacs has the word 'mac' in its name. Yuck

- Raw text -