From: "David Mitchell" <dmitchell AT inet DOT net DOT nz>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RHIDE AND EMACS...Which one is better?
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 16:34:39 +1200
Organization: Inet Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <934174532.375811@kyle.inet.net.nz>
References: <19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kyle.inet.net.nz
X-Trace: titan.xtra.co.nz 934173500 6441958 202.50.171.4 (9 Aug 1999 04:38:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT xtra DOT co DOT nz
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Aug 1999 04:38:20 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Cache-Post-Path: kyle.inet.net.nz!unknown AT p169-tnt1 DOT inet DOT net DOT nz
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


Orvbongat wrote in message <19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com>...
>Which is one is a better IDE...Rhide or EMACS?
>

A matter of opinion really.  I prefer RHIDE, because it has that familiar
DOS feel, but I'm sure a UNIX boffin would be scoffing at this and would be
able to name a thousand reasons which make emacs better.

David

PS I also prefer RHIDE because emacs has the word 'mac' in its name. Yuck