Date:	Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:22:42 +0200
From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Message-Id:	<199908031222.OAA09600@acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
To:	zidharta AT geocities DOT com
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: any good image format ?
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Organization:	RWTH Aachen, III. physikalisches Institut B
X-Newsreader:	TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <7o5eea$h82$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> you wrote:
> is there any good image format that have no patent problem like gif
> ?... is jpg a good format to stick with?...

JPG is a good format in its own right, but it doesn't really fit as a
replacement for GIF. If there's a single 'optimal' replacement for
GIF, then PNG (or it's proposed successor, MNG) is it: 

* paletted images are possible
* packs even better than GIF
* as free as can be 
* major WWW browsers support it

The only drawback I know: no animated PNG, yet. That's what 'MNG' will
be for.

--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -