Date:	Tue, 1 Jun 1999 17:05:29 +0200
From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Message-Id:	<199906011505.RAA13675@acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: libf2c.a library and "f2c" vs "g77"
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Organization:	RWTH Aachen, III. physikalisches Institut B
X-Newsreader:	TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19990601105617 DOT 007c6210 AT jafar DOT uqar DOT uquebec DOT ca> you wrote:

[...]
> Last question: If I understand well, g77 has grown from f2c? Does g77
> "include" f2c? What exactly is the difference? Which is better?

g77 itself has not exactly grown from f2c. Only its runtime library,
libg2c, has.  Originally, g77 shipped with no runtime at all, telling
you to get the libf2c from the regular f2c distribution and use that.
At least that's what I remember it to have been like.

Later on, they started using a modified libf2c, so they renamed it to
'libg2c' to avoid conflicts, in case someone wanted to use both g77
and f2c on the same system.

--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -