Message-Id:	<3.0.6.32.19990128120519.007f6c10@pop.netaddress.com>
X-Sender:	pderbysh AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:05:19 -0500
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From:	Paul Derbyshire <pderbysh AT usa DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Templates, namespaces
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990128162725.29318B-100000@is>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990128063125 DOT 00837460 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

At 04:28 PM 1/28/99 +0200, you wrote:
>You can't be serious.  A year ago you didn't have exceptions supported at 
>all, IIRC, and templates had serious bugs.  GCC 2.8.1 fixed these 
>problems, AFAIK.

A year ago is about when gcc 2.8.1 came out. It fixed exceptions and
provided some improvement to template instantiation but still had trouble
with template instantiation if two source files used a common template
instantiation. There were workarounds but these were iffy and usually
unsatisfactory. Namespaces were still unsupported.

I was asking if any new gcc is out that improves these issues. Particularly
template instantiation. Is there a gcc 2.8.2 or higher in the works?
-- 
   .*.  "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not
-()  <  circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a
   `*'  straight line."    -------------------------------------------------
        -- B. Mandelbrot  |http://surf.to/pgd.net
_____________________ ____|________     Paul Derbyshire     pderbysh AT usa DOT net
Programmer & Humanist|ICQ: 10423848|

- Raw text -