From:	"Pierre Beaulieu" <pbeaulie AT videotron DOT ca>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 981101142100 DOT 6846U-100000 AT is>
Subject:	Re: DjGPP 2.02 981027 Suggestion
Lines:	32
Organization:	Preferred Company
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Message-ID:	<6Z8%1.590$5B5.157@weber.videotron.net>
Date:	Sun, 1 Nov 1998 21:40:31 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host:	207.253.57.166
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT videotron DOT net
X-Trace:	weber.videotron.net 909974466 207.253.57.166 (Sun, 01 Nov 1998 21:41:06 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 01 Nov 1998 21:41:06 EDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Does that version is available on the DJGPP WEB Site???

Thank you,

Pierre Beaulieu

Eli Zaretskii wrote in message ...
>
>On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Nicolas Blais wrote:
>
>> I've got that version of DJgpp and it's fine so far, exept the way dir
>> (of info, in c:\djgpp\info\dir) is structured. I like the old one
>> better.
>
>Would you care to explain why?  What is the importance of how the DIR
>file is structured, anyway, since typing "m TOPIC" will go to that
>topic no matter where its item is in the menu?
>
>> Also, running info.exe in real mode dos doesn't work, it
>> just exits with errors. But in windows 95 it works fine.
>
>Please post the exact error message(s) that you saw.  Please also make
>sure you run the latest info.exe from txi312b.zip.  That version works
>for me on DOS and Windows 9X alike.
>
>
>> Anyways, that's my opinion; keep the old dir.
>
>The old file cannot be kept verbatim, because some items need to be
>added to it due to recent developments, new ports, etc.

- Raw text -