From: "Pierre Beaulieu" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: Subject: Re: DjGPP 2.02 981027 Suggestion Lines: 32 Organization: Preferred Company X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Message-ID: <6Z8%1.590$5B5.157@weber.videotron.net> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 21:40:31 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.253.57.166 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT videotron DOT net X-Trace: weber.videotron.net 909974466 207.253.57.166 (Sun, 01 Nov 1998 21:41:06 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1998 21:41:06 EDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Does that version is available on the DJGPP WEB Site??? Thank you, Pierre Beaulieu Eli Zaretskii wrote in message ... > >On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Nicolas Blais wrote: > >> I've got that version of DJgpp and it's fine so far, exept the way dir >> (of info, in c:\djgpp\info\dir) is structured. I like the old one >> better. > >Would you care to explain why? What is the importance of how the DIR >file is structured, anyway, since typing "m TOPIC" will go to that >topic no matter where its item is in the menu? > >> Also, running info.exe in real mode dos doesn't work, it >> just exits with errors. But in windows 95 it works fine. > >Please post the exact error message(s) that you saw. Please also make >sure you run the latest info.exe from txi312b.zip. That version works >for me on DOS and Windows 9X alike. > > >> Anyways, that's my opinion; keep the old dir. > >The old file cannot be kept verbatim, because some items need to be >added to it due to recent developments, new ports, etc.