Message-Id:	<m0yhDHO-000S3xC@inti.gov.ar>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
To:	zager AT post DOT comstar DOT ru, djgpp AT delorie DOT com, mop45440 AT mail DOT telepac DOT pt
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 1998 10:11:42 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Goodbye/Congratulations note
In-reply-to:	<3574D3C4.872EEBFD@post.comstar.ru>

I don't want to start another holly war, but ....
 
 Dim Zegebart <zager AT post DOT comstar DOT ru> wrote:
> Dark Angel wrote:
> 
> > As much as i don't like it, i think the future is in Windows programming.
> 
> Did you try Linux ?
> IMHO, if you want to write in C serious robust programms UNIX is the only
> possible choice. Moreover, LINUX has _MUCH_ more free stuff then Win.
> Just spend a month or two of your time playing with Linux box and you'll
> understand
> weak and ugly nature of all MS software.

I agree 100%, but if you want to write programs for "the big market" you can't 
use Linux, you must use M$ products. Is lamentably but is true.
 
> With my best wishes.
> 
> PS. IMHO,  gcc beat all this Borland,MsVisual, Watcom, etc.

I agree with it too, but there are some important things to point, the most sad 
is that M$, Watcom and Intel compilers generates better Pentium code (and even 
better 486 code) than gcc. (Look comparissons in Byte articles, download the 
sources, compile it and make your own comparissons).

SET 
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013

- Raw text -