Date:	Sun, 19 Apr 1998 14:23:56 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
cc:	Ryuji Yokoyama <rqy1319 AT is4 DOT nyu DOT edu>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: What did I miss ?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980417210219.1273C-100000@unixbox.bitbucket.org>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.980419142338.23362Q-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:

> Is GCC 2.8 supposed to be used only with Binutils 2.8.1? Because if not,
> this is a problem in any case, because somebody might use 2.7.

GCC 2.8 doesn't require Binutils 2.8.x, but I doubt if it would
survive the lack of lib/specs file, for any of the reasons you can
think of.  I just don't think that linking with no stubify step should
do any harm with Binutils 2.8.1.

- Raw text -