Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 14:23:56 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
cc: Ryuji Yokoyama <rqy1319 AT is4 DOT nyu DOT edu>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: What did I miss ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980417210219.1273C-100000@unixbox.bitbucket.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980419142338.23362Q-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:

> Is GCC 2.8 supposed to be used only with Binutils 2.8.1? Because if not,
> this is a problem in any case, because somebody might use 2.7.

GCC 2.8 doesn't require Binutils 2.8.x, but I doubt if it would
survive the lack of lib/specs file, for any of the reasons you can
think of.  I just don't think that linking with no stubify step should
do any harm with Binutils 2.8.1.