Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/02/17/04:25:24
In article <7Ntd3AAprI60Ewey AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>, Shawn Hargreaves <Shawn AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
>Anthony.Appleyard writes:
>>I asked about this at a PC suppliers and he said that `interrupt 9 is
>>referred internally to interrupt 2' and suchlike.
*** This is incorrect. I think he was referring to the fact that IRQ 2 is now
used as the cascade IRQ for the second interrupt controller. The original IRQ
2 has been remapped to IRQ 9, because that wasn't used anyway. Interrupt 9 is
IRQ 1 (keyboard).
Regards,
Steven Don
- Raw text -