From: shd AT earthling DOT net (Steven Don)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Hooking interrupt 9 clashing with new types of BIOS?
Date: 16 Feb 1998 22:22:43 GMT
Organization: EuroNet Internet
Lines: 11
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <6cae7j$8eg@news.euro.net>
References: <C5E3A253E3 AT fs2 DOT mt DOT umist DOT ac DOT uk> <7Ntd3AAprI60Ewey AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: breda04.pstn07.concepts.nl
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <7Ntd3AAprI60Ewey AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>, Shawn Hargreaves <Shawn AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
>Anthony.Appleyard writes:
>>I asked about this at a PC suppliers and he said that `interrupt 9 is
>>referred internally to interrupt 2' and suchlike.
*** This is incorrect. I think he was referring to the fact that IRQ 2 is now 
used as the cascade IRQ for the second interrupt controller. The original IRQ 
2 has been remapped to IRQ 9, because that wasn't used anyway. Interrupt 9 is 
IRQ 1 (keyboard).

Regards,
  Steven Don