Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/02/04/14:19:41
>
> On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, S. M. Halloran wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to say that Rylan's question was not stupid, am not
> > sure why he (she?) inferred it was stupid from the somewhat terse
> > reply to it, and hope that Rylan did not take the response
> > personally, as could be assumed by Rylan's choice of wording in
> > the reply to the reply.
>
> Nobody replied that Rylan's question was stupid. It was Rylan's own
My own understanding of the English language suggests to me that what
I wrote did not at all say another person said that Rylan's question
was stupid.
> judgement, after reading the responses. Everyone is entitled to
> call their own questions stupid. So let's not make a fuss out of
> this, okay?
True, everyone can characterize their own actions...and someone
else's too. I just thought it odd that someone would go out of their
way to feel his question was stupid, and then proceed to tell others
of that too, unless perhaps he was trying to make another point. ;)
Mitch Halloran
Research (Bio)chemist
Duzen Laboratories Group
Ankara TURKEY
mitch AT duzen DOT com DOT tr
other job title: Sequoia's (dob 12-20-95) daddy
- Raw text -