Message-Id: <199802041914.VAA07537@ankara.duzen.com.tr>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <mitch AT ankara DOT duzen DOT com DOT tr>
From: "S. M. Halloran" <mitch AT duzen DOT com DOT tr>
Organization: User RFC 822- and 1123-Compliant
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 21:15:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Freeing static vars
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References: <199802041506 DOT RAA05731 AT ankara DOT duzen DOT com DOT tr>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980204195304.26711D-100000@is>
Precedence: bulk

> 
> On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, S. M. Halloran wrote:
> 
> > I just wanted to say that Rylan's question was not stupid, am not 
> > sure why he (she?) inferred it was stupid from the somewhat terse 
> > reply to it, and hope that Rylan did not take the response 
> > personally, as could be assumed by Rylan's choice of wording in
> > the reply to the reply.
> 
> Nobody replied that Rylan's question was stupid.  It was Rylan's own

My own understanding of the English language suggests to me that what 
I wrote did not at all say another person said that Rylan's question 
was stupid.

> judgement, after reading the responses.  Everyone is entitled to
> call their own questions stupid.  So let's not make a fuss out of
> this, okay?

True, everyone can characterize their own actions...and someone 
else's too. I just thought it odd that someone would go out of their 
way to feel his question was stupid, and then proceed to tell others 
of that too, unless perhaps he was trying to make another point. ;)

Mitch Halloran
Research (Bio)chemist
Duzen Laboratories Group
Ankara   TURKEY
mitch AT duzen DOT com DOT tr

other job title:  Sequoia's (dob 12-20-95) daddy