Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/01/30/06:31:45
John M. Aldrich wrote:
[...]
> Nevertheless, is it so worth it to skip those couple of annoying emails
> that you run the risk of annoying people that you actually care about?
> I don't accept that "nothing is going to change" argument. We failed
> miserably at combatting spam in the first place; at the very least we
> can fight this.
Uhm. I don't think we failed badly, reading this over the NG I
saw 2 UCE's over thelst two weeks, I think. I'd say DJ's filtering
rules are pretty good.
> Even though I don't pay per-time for my Internet access, I still hate
> getting bounced emails telling me that I failed to notice somebody's
> anti-spam protection.
That's why I usually don't CC:.
#define FLAME
And for that postmaster AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1-______ (left blank for lack
of knowing the right four letter word that _really_ hits it),
I already get enough mislead mail from jerks that cannot spell,
I do not need anymore bullshit like that.
#undef FLAME
Anyway, let's stop this before DJ jumps in ;-)
--
Ciao
Tom
*************************************************************
* Thomas Demmer *
* Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik *
* Ruhr-Uni-Bochum *
* Universitaetsstr. 150 *
* D-44780 Bochum *
* Tel: +49 234 700 6434 *
* Fax: +49 234 709 4162 *
* http://www.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~demmer *
*************************************************************
- Raw text -