From: Thomas Demmer Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: TC++ syntax? Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 11:46:11 +0100 Organization: Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik Lines: 40 Message-ID: <34D1AF73.32F175FC@LSTM.Ruhr-UNI-Bochum.De> References: <6aqoqo$qnb$2 AT winter DOT news DOT erols DOT com> <34D15BD2 DOT 50FC AT cs DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bvb.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk John M. Aldrich wrote: [...] > Nevertheless, is it so worth it to skip those couple of annoying emails > that you run the risk of annoying people that you actually care about? > I don't accept that "nothing is going to change" argument. We failed > miserably at combatting spam in the first place; at the very least we > can fight this. Uhm. I don't think we failed badly, reading this over the NG I saw 2 UCE's over thelst two weeks, I think. I'd say DJ's filtering rules are pretty good. > Even though I don't pay per-time for my Internet access, I still hate > getting bounced emails telling me that I failed to notice somebody's > anti-spam protection. That's why I usually don't CC:. #define FLAME And for that postmaster AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1-______ (left blank for lack of knowing the right four letter word that _really_ hits it), I already get enough mislead mail from jerks that cannot spell, I do not need anymore bullshit like that. #undef FLAME Anyway, let's stop this before DJ jumps in ;-) -- Ciao Tom ************************************************************* * Thomas Demmer * * Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik * * Ruhr-Uni-Bochum * * Universitaetsstr. 150 * * D-44780 Bochum * * Tel: +49 234 700 6434 * * Fax: +49 234 709 4162 * * http://www.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~demmer * *************************************************************