Message-ID:	<1.5.4.32.19970426115127.006a2c2c@ubeclu.unibe.ch>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Sat, 26 Apr 1997 13:51:27 +0200
To:	Tom Burgess <Tom_Burgess AT bc DOT sympatico DOT ca>
From:	Roger Noss <noss AT pupk DOT unibe DOT ch>
Subject:	Re: testing uclock()
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

At 09:15 PM 4/25/97 -0700, you wrote:
>	- use of short ints on Pentiums is expensive (more CPU cycles)

Thanks for your suggestions.  I assume you mean short int is more expensive
than int?  Can you recommend a reference for this sort of knowledge?

Roger Noss

- Raw text -