Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970426115127.006a2c2c@ubeclu.unibe.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 13:51:27 +0200
To: Tom Burgess <Tom_Burgess AT bc DOT sympatico DOT ca>
From: Roger Noss <noss AT pupk DOT unibe DOT ch>
Subject: Re: testing uclock()
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 09:15 PM 4/25/97 -0700, you wrote:
>	- use of short ints on Pentiums is expensive (more CPU cycles)

Thanks for your suggestions.  I assume you mean short int is more expensive
than int?  Can you recommend a reference for this sort of knowledge?

Roger Noss