Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/02/25/01:37:14
I believe that, to most of its users, dgjpp is something they have to
have if they want to run things like GhostScript.
Thus, to me, the sequence
user -> ??? -> comp -> os -> msdos -> djgpp
seems natural.
However, I accept DJ's judgement about the pragmatics of the situation.
But gnu.gcc.djgpp strikes me as redundant.
gnu.djgpp.x
gnu.djgpp.y
gnu.djgpp.z
I think it is unlikely that anyone who is using djgpp to get at gcc does
not already know that a gcc compiler is included in djgpp.
I vote thus:
gnu.djgpp.announce
gnu.djgpp.help
gnu.djgpp.developers
Bill Hogan
{bhogan AT crl DOT com}
- Raw text -