Date: Thu, 24 Feb 1994 21:22:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Hogan <bhogan AT crl DOT com>
Sender: Bill Hogan <bhogan AT crl DOT com>
Reply-To: Bill Hogan <bhogan AT crl DOT com>
Subject: Re: Too many groups? (was: start a news group!)
To: Steve VanDevender <stevev AT miser DOT uoregon DOT edu>
Cc: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu


 I believe that, to most of its users, dgjpp is something they have to
have if they want to run things like GhostScript.

 Thus, to me, the sequence

	user -> ??? -> comp -> os -> msdos -> djgpp

seems natural.

 However, I accept DJ's judgement about the pragmatics of the situation. 

 But gnu.gcc.djgpp strikes me as redundant.

 	gnu.djgpp.x
	gnu.djgpp.y
	gnu.djgpp.z

 I think it is unlikely that anyone who is using djgpp to get at gcc does
not already know that a gcc compiler is included in djgpp. 

 I vote thus:

	gnu.djgpp.announce
	gnu.djgpp.help
	gnu.djgpp.developers

  Bill Hogan
{bhogan AT crl DOT com}