X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <AndrewCottrell AT swiftdsl DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Re-evaluate DJGPP 2.04 release schedule?
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:59:40 +1000
Message-ID:	<000001c396e8$82bb5500$0101a8c0@acp42g>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<3F9292DF.355C815D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h9K9QaCF032511
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> * I don't have much spare time these days and when I do, I'm 
> feeling less and less inclined to spend it hacking on DJGPP. 
> After sitting in front of a computer at work all week, I'd 
> rather not do that for the entire weekend.
100% agree, I have been searching for a house and bought one two weeks ago. 
 
> * Not much work has been done on DJGPP in general recently.
This is what I am seeing as well.

> So I'm wondering if we should bugfix what we have and push 
> the nmalloc and C99 maths stuff into DJGPP 2.05 (whenever 
> that will come out). Then we could release 2.04 faster.
I agree. I cannot remember anyone saying that they need it because it is
requried by a program they are writing. I could have missed a post.
 
> Maybe I'll do more as the days get shorter and the nights get 
> longer here in the UK...
It's the opposite in Sydney.
 
> It worries me that few bugs have been reported in DJGPP 2.04 
> alpha 1. AFAICR only one or two bugs have been reported. 
> Maybe people just aren't using it.
Or it could be that people are not coming across the bugs.

> Are people using DJGPP much these days? Is it dying out?
I am using MS VS C++ more and more these days at work and as such less and
less DJGPP. I am thinking of taking a good look at Cygwin or MinGW or DEVC++
(MinGW derivative I think).

Andrew

- Raw text -