X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: Subject: RE: Re-evaluate DJGPP 2.04 release schedule? Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:59:40 +1000 Message-ID: <000001c396e8$82bb5500$0101a8c0@acp42g> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3F9292DF.355C815D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h9K9QaCF032511 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > * I don't have much spare time these days and when I do, I'm > feeling less and less inclined to spend it hacking on DJGPP. > After sitting in front of a computer at work all week, I'd > rather not do that for the entire weekend. 100% agree, I have been searching for a house and bought one two weeks ago. > * Not much work has been done on DJGPP in general recently. This is what I am seeing as well. > So I'm wondering if we should bugfix what we have and push > the nmalloc and C99 maths stuff into DJGPP 2.05 (whenever > that will come out). Then we could release 2.04 faster. I agree. I cannot remember anyone saying that they need it because it is requried by a program they are writing. I could have missed a post. > Maybe I'll do more as the days get shorter and the nights get > longer here in the UK... It's the opposite in Sydney. > It worries me that few bugs have been reported in DJGPP 2.04 > alpha 1. AFAICR only one or two bugs have been reported. > Maybe people just aren't using it. Or it could be that people are not coming across the bugs. > Are people using DJGPP much these days? Is it dying out? I am using MS VS C++ more and more these days at work and as such less and less DJGPP. I am thinking of taking a good look at Cygwin or MinGW or DEVC++ (MinGW derivative I think). Andrew