From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200306211445.h5LEjleO010415@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: fpclassify
In-Reply-To:	<1438-Sat21Jun2003173420+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> "from Eli Zaretskii
	at Jun 21, 2003 05:34:21 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:45:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> > Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:08:44 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> > Note that I kept __attribute((const)) in the texinfo file.
> 
> I'm not sure that's a good idea; I'm afraid it will confuse users.
> Can you tell why you decided to keep it?

Well. My thinking was full information is better than lack of
it. Cf. the recent discussion about abort().

But I've no strong feelings about this.

> Where's the docs for the fpclassify macro itself?  Did I miss
> something?

No. It's missing. Will make.

> Also, there should be an entry in wc204.txi for this addition.

Yes.

> > --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ djgpp/src/libc/c99/math/fpclassd.txh	21 Jun 2003 14:03:16 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +@ignore
> > + * File fpclassl.txh.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2003 Martin Str@"omberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>.
> > + *
> > + * This software may be used freely so long as this copyright notice is
> > + * left intact. There is no warranty on this software.
> > + *
> > +@end ignore
> 
> Something for DJ to decide: since documentation is not ``software'',
> I'd say this text is not entirely appropriate in a .txh file.

The documentation is part of the software I provide. I worked on this.

Note the license can't become more free than that (at least that's my
goal) unless I'd put it in public domain.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -