Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3EA450CB.531C5769@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:12:59 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: nmalloc revisited
References:	<10304211942 DOT AA12379 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Charles Sandmann wrote:
[snip]
> > What about my new method of installing hooks?
> 
> I will defer to Eli and other developers on that call.  I have no
> opinion either way.  But we must be compatible with V2.03,
> provide the needed V2.04 functionality (assumed to be CVS type
> features) and the documentation matches the code.

The current debug interface in CVS is compatible with Unix and Linux systems
(see src/docs/kb/wc204.txi).

My opinion is still that nmalloc must provide the same interface as current
CVS, to be incorporated in CVS. If it happens to provide an additional more
fully-functioned or finely-grained interface, then that would be fine.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -