Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3EA450CB.531C5769@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:12:59 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: nmalloc revisited
References: <10304211942 DOT AA12379 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Charles Sandmann wrote:
[snip]
> > What about my new method of installing hooks?
> 
> I will defer to Eli and other developers on that call.  I have no
> opinion either way.  But we must be compatible with V2.03,
> provide the needed V2.04 functionality (assumed to be CVS type
> features) and the documentation matches the code.

The current debug interface in CVS is compatible with Unix and Linux systems
(see src/docs/kb/wc204.txi).

My opinion is still that nmalloc must provide the same interface as current
CVS, to be incorporated in CVS. If it happens to provide an additional more
fully-functioned or finely-grained interface, then that would be fine.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]