Date:	Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:11:17 +0200 (EET)
From:	Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender:	peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Add @tindex for types in docs [PATCH]
In-Reply-To:	<3E428516.6E9BF039@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.51.0302071259470.25428@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References:	<E18fmrW-0000gG-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0302041153300 DOT 10610 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	<3E3FDCB5 DOT D2875A7E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0302051322280 DOT 1814 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	<2561-Wed05Feb2003174006+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E428516 DOT 6E9BF039 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:

> Another solution to problem (a) is to get mkdoc to do the hard work. mkdoc
> could generate a file containing all the -I options.

Why not simply have mkdoc do the inclusion itself?  After all, even now
mkdoc reads all the .txh files into memory first and only then dumps
them to libc2.tex; it would be quite easy to make it dump pieces of text
more than once.  And I'd also like mkdoc to read libc.tex and actually
output one single Texinfo file which neither includes other files nor is
included by other files; then it would be easier to use mkdoc for
utils.info as well as libc.info.

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/

- Raw text -