Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:11:17 +0200 (EET) From: Esa A E Peuha Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Add @tindex for types in docs [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <3E428516.6E9BF039@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <3E3FDCB5 DOT D2875A7E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2561-Wed05Feb2003174006+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E428516 DOT 6E9BF039 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Richard Dawe wrote: > Another solution to problem (a) is to get mkdoc to do the hard work. mkdoc > could generate a file containing all the -I options. Why not simply have mkdoc do the inclusion itself? After all, even now mkdoc reads all the .txh files into memory first and only then dumps them to libc2.tex; it would be quite easy to make it dump pieces of text more than once. And I'd also like mkdoc to read libc.tex and actually output one single Texinfo file which neither includes other files nor is included by other files; then it would be easier to use mkdoc for utils.info as well as libc.info. -- Esa Peuha student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/