From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200301061401.h06E1E118542@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	diff format (was: Re: your mail)
In-Reply-To:	<3E196182.AC93EFB3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at
	Jan 6, 2003 10:59:14 am"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:01:14 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore:	s
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Richard Dawe:
> ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> > Please, put a sensible subject on your mails.

Hrmm, and I forgot to better it...

> > Here. We prefer patches made with "diff -pruN" or "diff -prN", if I'm
> > not mistaken.
> 
> I seem to remember Eli expressing a preference for context diffs (-prcN) a
> while back. But no-one seemed to object, when I mistakenly posted unified
> diffs. ;)

Sorry, I thought diff defaulted to context diffs.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -